Introduction
In today’s digital-first business environment, enterprises must unleash the hidden value within their network infrastructure to maintain competitive advantage. As organizations increasingly depend on cloud applications and remote workforces, SD-WAN technology offers a dramatic financial edge over legacy networks, transforming how businesses connect their distributed resources. The limitations of traditional Wide Area Network (WAN) architectures have become increasingly apparent as companies seek solutions that provide both operational and financial benefits.
But does SD-WAN truly deliver a better return on investment (ROI) than traditional WAN solutions? This analysis explores the financial and operational benefits of both approaches to help enterprise decision-makers make informed choices about their network infrastructure investments.
Understanding Traditional WAN
Traditional WAN architectures typically rely on dedicated private connections like MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) circuits to connect branch offices to corporate data centres. While reliable and secure, these connections come with significant limitations:
- High Costs: MPLS bandwidth is expensive, often costing 3-10x more than broadband internet connections
- Long Provisioning Times: New circuits can take weeks or months to deploy
- Limited Flexibility: Rigid architectures make it difficult to adapt to changing business needs
- Complex Management: Requires specialized expertise and equipment
Despite these drawbacks, traditional MPLS WANs remain prevalent in industries with strict security and reliability requirements, such as finance, healthcare, and government.
The SD-WAN Alternative
SD-WAN solutions abstract the underlying network hardware, using software to intelligently direct traffic across multiple connection types based on application requirements, network conditions, and business policies. Key features include:
- Transport Agnostic: Can use any combination of MPLS, broadband, LTE, or 5G
- Centralized Management: Configuration and policy deployment via cloud-based controllers
- Application-Aware Routing: Dynamically selects optimal paths for different applications
- Built-in Security: Many solutions include integrated firewall, encryption, and segmentation
These capabilities address many traditional MPLS WAN limitations, but implementing SD-WAN involves both initial costs and potential organizational changes.
ROI Analysis: Cost Factors
Capital Expenditures (CAPEX)
Traditional MPLS WAN:
- Hardware costs per site:
- Enterprise-grade routers: NZ$3,000-10,000 per location (depending on capacity and features)
- Redundant hardware for failover: 40-60% additional cost
- Implementation costs:
- Professional installation: NZ$1,500-4,000 per site
- Network engineering services: NZ$180-250 per hour
- Initial configuration: NZ$2,000-5,000 for network design and deployment
- Additional CAPEX components:
- Security appliances: NZ$2,500-8,000 per location
- On-premises management systems: NZ$10,000-30,000 for central management
- Backup connectivity hardware: NZ$1,000-3,000 per site
For a mid-sized enterprise with 5-10 locations in New Zealand, total CAPEX for a traditional MPLS WAN deployment typically ranges from NZ$75,000-200,000, excluding ongoing OPEX costs such as circuit fees, maintenance, and support contracts.
Keep in mind that these figures are approximate and can vary based on specific vendor pricing, network complexity, and negotiated enterprise discounts.
SD-WAN:
- Hardware costs per site:
- SD-WAN edge devices/appliances: NZ$1,500-6,000 per location (depending on capacity and features)
- Optional hardware for specialized functions: NZ$2,000-5,000 per site where needed
- Redundant appliances (if required): 30-50% additional cost
- Implementation costs:
- Professional installation: NZ$1,000-3,000 per site
- SD-WAN deployment services: NZ$180-250 per hour
- Initial configuration and network design: NZ$1,500-4,000
- Additional CAPEX components:
- Central orchestrator (if on-premises): NZ$8,000-25,000
- One-time licensing fees (if not subscription-based): NZ$1,000-3,000 per site
- Integration services: NZ$3,000-10,000 depending on complexity
For a mid-sized enterprise with 5-10 locations in New Zealand, total CAPEX for an SD-WAN deployment typically ranges from NZ$40,000-120,000, representing a 30-50% reduction compared to traditional MPLS WAN infrastructure.
Note that many SD-WAN providers now offer subscription-based models that shift costs from CAPEX to OPEX, further reducing initial investment. Cloud-based management platforms can also eliminate the need for on-premises orchestration hardware.

Operational Expenditures (OPEX)
Traditional MPLS WAN OPEX (Monthly/Annual Costs)
- Connectivity costs:
- MPLS circuit fees: NZ$500-3,000 per month per site (depending on bandwidth)
- Backup circuits: NZ$300-1,000 per month per site
- Maintenance and support:
- Hardware maintenance contracts: 15-25% of hardware cost annually
- 24/7 technical support: NZ$10,000-25,000 annually
- Network monitoring services: NZ$500-1,500 per month
- Operational costs:
- Network admin staffing: NZ$85,000-120,000 annual salary per specialist
- Training and certification: NZ$3,000-8,000 annually
- Change management costs: NZ$5,000-15,000 annually
SD-WAN OPEX (Monthly/Annual Costs)
- Connectivity costs:
- Primary broadband connections: NZ$100-800 per month per site
- Secondary connections/LTE backup: NZ$100-400 per month per site
- Possible retained MPLS for critical applications: Reduced capacity at NZ$400-1,500 per month per site
- Subscription and licensing:
- SD-WAN service fees: NZ$200-600 per month per site
- Security services (if bundled): NZ$100-300 per month per site
- Management platform fees: NZ$500-2,000 per month (enterprise-wide)
- Maintenance and support:
- Hardware support (reduced): 10-15% of hardware cost annually
- Vendor support contracts: NZ$5,000-15,000 annually
- Cloud orchestration updates: Often included in subscription
- Operational costs:
- Reduced network admin requirements: 30-50% less than traditional WAN
- Training and certification: NZ$2,000-5,000 annually
- Change management costs: NZ$2,000-8,000 annually (simplified)
Cost Comparison Summary
For a mid-sized NZ enterprise with 8 locations, annual OPEX typically ranges from:
- Traditional MPLS WAN: NZ$180,000-400,000 annually
- SD-WAN solution: NZ$90,000-250,000 annually
SD-WAN generally delivers 30-60% OPEX savings compared to traditional MPLS WANs in the New Zealand market, with the biggest savings coming from reduced connectivity costs and simplified network management requirements.
The above CAPEX and OPEX figures are general amounts tailored to the NZ market provided for illustrative purposes only. These will vary for your particular circumstance.
ROI Analysis: Benefit Factors
Quantitative Benefits
Bandwidth Cost Savings: By leveraging less expensive broadband connections alongside or in place of MPLS, NZ enterprises typically reduce WAN transport costs by 30-60%. For a New Zealand company with 10 locations, this can translate to annual savings of NZ$50,000-NZ$180,000.
IT Operations Efficiency: Centralised management reduces deployment time for new sites from weeks to days. Configuration changes that once required specialised personnel at each location can be made globally in minutes. This efficiency typically reduces operational costs by 50-75% for New Zealand businesses.
Reduced Downtime: By providing automatic failover between multiple connection types, SD-WAN significantly reduces network outages. Industry data suggests a 65-90% reduction in downtime, which for a medium-sized NZ enterprise can save NZ$30,000-NZ$120,000 in lost productivity annually.
Qualitative Benefits
Business Agility: SD-WAN enables rapid deployment of new locations and services, allowing businesses to respond more quickly to market opportunities.
Enhanced User Experience: Improved application performance, particularly for cloud services, leads to higher productivity and satisfaction for end-users.
Simplified Compliance: Built-in security features and standardized configurations make regulatory compliance easier to achieve and maintain.
Implementation Considerations
While the ROI analysis often favours SD-WAN, several factors can impact actual returns:
Existing Contract Obligations: Organizations with long-term MPLS contracts may face penalties for early termination, affecting near-term savings.
Security Requirements: Highly regulated industries may need to maintain some MPLS connectivity or implement additional security measures, reducing potential cost savings.
Geographic Considerations: In regions with limited broadband options, using internet-based connections may not be viable, necessitating a hybrid approach.
Organizational Readiness: IT teams accustomed to traditional networking may require training and time to adapt to the software-defined approach.
Migration Strategies
Most enterprises achieve optimal ROI through a phased migration:
- Pilot Phase: Implement SD-WAN at select sites alongside existing infrastructure
- Hybrid Phase: Gradually transition sites to SD-WAN while maintaining critical MPLS connections
- Optimization Phase: Fine-tune policies and connection types based on application performance and costs
- Full Deployment: Complete the transition with optimized design based on lessons learned
This approach minimizes disruption while allowing early benefits realization.
Conclusion
For most enterprises, SD-WAN offers compelling ROI advantages over traditional WAN architectures. The combination of reduced transport costs, operational efficiencies, and improved performance typically delivers payback within 6-18 months, with ongoing savings thereafter.
However, the optimal approach depends on each organization’s specific requirements, existing infrastructure, and business objectives. A thorough analysis of current costs, future needs, and implementation considerations is essential before making this significant investment.
By carefully evaluating both quantitative and qualitative factors, enterprises can develop a WAN strategy that not only reduces costs but also positions the organization for future growth and technological evolution.